There was nothing "purposeful" about this change of behaviour. It wasn't noticed when the fix for the other problem was checked. If you want a detailed explanation as to why the program now behaves in this manner I can give it to you.

Your client can move back to the previous release if they are very unhappy about the change.

My client isn't very unhappy.

I'm was trying to identify for Softrak an area of dissatisfaction before I attempt to upgrade the bulk of my 50+ OE users on Upgrade Plans, so that you get a chance to address it before too many other users complain (and they will).

I was also trying to be constructive and suggest a better way to design the functionality of the sizeable detail grids. I realize it might not be a simple change.

Steve

I hope this gets considered a design error and is changed back in the next service pack. Many end users are holding old orders for many valid reasons (though I'll agree that may more are holding old orders that they should not be) and rarely does anyone access the oldest order for any reason, certainly not the person doing invoicing.

Hi Doug,

This wasn't a "design error". It was an unnoticed change of behaviour as a result of fixing another problem during the final QA cycle of the product. We'll change it back. On the bright side, it pointed out the functionality of the home and end keys to Susan!

A Hot Fix is now available that address the issue of cursor placement on an inverted grid, the sizing of the line item dialog and the problem with the Order Action report amongst other items.

Thanks for your patience.

Great fix!

..and the home and end keys still work as before!