Hello Chuck O'Callaghan,
Don't worry, this is on our list of "Things we'd like to do" for FX.
It is not in this release as it would have seriously impacted the release of the product. Also, it's not a serious deficiency if you don't use departments (about 75% of ACCPAC Plus/Adagio users fall into this category - not to mention 95+% of Simply Accounting and QuickBooks users). There are a couple of workarounds I can suggest if the number of department you have is small and you are not using all 6 character positions for your account-department combinations. What is the account structure of the companies you are trying to compare?
I'm not quite sure I understand your comment: Your discussion of functionality issues, like "maintaining the departmentalization of multi-company comparatives", should be open. Why not use this forum?
We often discuss possible feature enhancements to our products within this forum, and welcome the opportunity to do so.
As regards "What other issues should we be aware of before investing our valuable time in learning to use this software?" I'm not sure. You should be aware that FX does not allow references between sheets (unlike Excel). FX also does not offer the option of "Fit to page" (unlike Excel). It also requires you to type in the cell references in formulas (unlike Excel). These are the three issues that most often raise their heads for new users. On the other hand, FX will produce a wide range of financial statements linked directly to your accounting data (unlike Excel
).
Let's see if we can get to the statements you're looking for. It may well be possible.
Thanks for using FX.