Enhancements & Revisions



Adagio Payables 9.2A


June 9, 2015



    ·    In Payables 9.2A, reversing a check did not reinstate the invoice(s) it paid if they were in history and caused the Data Integrity Check to report errors that could not be rebuilt.

    ·    Formatted addresses in vendors and when converting from prior versions now support Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands: St. Thomas, St. Croix, and St. John.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, when finding a vendor by Document Number, if multiple vendors have the same Document Number, the first one in the list was always used regardless of which one you selected.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the error “Invalid argument to date encode” was displayed in vendors in some cases when you sorted by Date and selected the ‘Both’ option on the Transactions tab.

    ·    If you edited an existing payment in a Manual Check batch, deleted or used the spacebar to remove the existing applied amounts and then reselected them for payment, the discount was not calculated.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, negative invoices and discounts on manual checks were not handled correctly in some cases.

    ·    You can no longer leave the Retainage Due Date blank while entering adjustment batches.

    ·    If 2 users retrieved Payables transactions in Adagio BankRec at exactly the same time, it was remotely possible for two batches for the same transactions to be created. This is now prevented providing BankRec is version 9.2A.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A when you created a new vendor “on the fly” from batch entry, the address did not display in formatted format until you reselected the ‘Format Address’ option on the vendor screen.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the progress bar was missing in some cases when Generating a system check run or Pre-Check Register. This could cause the program to appear to be hung and, if you attempted to close the program during this time, there was an error.

    ·    If after printing system checks or manual checks you said ‘Yes’ to additional forms, they could not be previewed but only printed.

    ·    Added new specification codes primarily for use on 1099 / 1096 forms, in particular for printing the address on Copy A (the Federal copy).

    M46 Company City, State, Zip/Postal
    V72 Vendor City, State, Zip/Postal

    ·    An Access Violation error occurred if you previewed letters, 1099s or T5018 to screen and then printed them to printer from the preview.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, Batch Listing reports sorted the accounts within an entry instead of in the order they were entered, which is how they were sorted in prior versions and how the drilldown to Transaction detail in the vendor shows them. This has been corrected.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the Adjustment Batch Listing did not print the vendor name when printed in Detail format.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the vendor name was missing in some cases on the Invoice Posting Journal.

    ·    The Open Payables and Aged Open Payables reports now disable the ‘Zero balance vendors’ option when printed backdated, instead of simply ignoring the option because the vendor balance cannot be calculated as of a particular date. All vendors are therefore included without regard to balance when the report is backdated.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the Aged Open Payables report could not be printed if the ‘Calculate as of’ date used was earlier than the last clearing date.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the Aged Overdue Payables report did not report transactions that were in history.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the percentage totals on the Aged Open Payables and Aged Overdue Payables reports were rounded to the nearest whole number, even though the values are displayed to 2 decimals.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the Aged Open Payables reported Payments applied to invoices printed with the wrong home currency amount.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the Check Reconciliation report did not show the status for void checks nor where they included in the summary section at the end of the report.

    ·    The G/L Distribution Summary did not print on the Check Reconciliation report in Payables 9.2A.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A the Check Number Audit List (Checks In Progress) report showed checks that were actually already posted in some cases. In addition, the Check Type field was suppressed when it should not have been.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the Check Number Audit List report did not show the Check Type field for ‘Not Printed’.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the G/L Transaction report and the G/L Summary on the Batch Listing and Posting Journal were sorted incorrectly if you use G/L Departments, depending on the configuration of your Chart of Accounts.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A for single currency databases, the Tax Tracking report printed on Legal size paper, whether printed directly or from the Preview. This caused the printer to prompt for Legal pager or print on 8.5 x 11 paper with the bottom of the page cut off. The Preview also showed in Legal size. When printed to PDF, the report was compressed to fit the page but printed to 8.4 x 11 paper.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, if you selected a different printer tray in the Paper Source on the report dialog when printing checks, the checks printed on the default tray rather than the selected tray. There was no problem if a different tray was specified in the printer driver.

    ·    After converting data for Payables 9.2A, the Send to A/J settings on the Integration tab in the Company Profile were lost and had to be re-selected. This has been corrected in the conversion. However, if you are integrated to JobCost and have already converted your data you should check the settings.

    ·    The Data Integrity Check (DIC) now detects vendors with a blank in the Tax Status on the Payee/PO tab. If this field was blank, it caused problems in Adagio PurchaseOrders. The DIC rebuild sets the Tax Status to the first one on file.

    ·    The Data Integrity Check detects and rebuilds additional errors related to discrepancies between the next batch numbers in batch status and open batch files.

    ·    DataCare displayed an error when opened after Payables 9.2A was installed but JobCost 8.1C was not installed.

    ·    Multiselect did not work in the Payment Control function in Payables 9.2A.

    ·    The Composite tables were missing in the Payables 9.2A data dictionary (@P92A).

    ·    Relaxed locking for imports. Previous versions would not allow an import if Edit Vendor or batch entry was open, or if a batch was being posted.

    ·    Added the option 'One detail per entry' to Import Invoices. It can be used when the 'Header fields on each record?' option is on. Use it when an import file contains multiple invoices in a row for the same vendor but an invoice number is not imported; it is generated during import. In previous versions, this would consolidate the invoices into a single invoice entry. Note that if this option is used then invoices with multiple distributions cannot be imported as they would be split into separate invoice entries. In addition, if the Invoice Number field is included in the import and it is not blank, it can be used to split multiple invoices in a row for a vendor for a batch of Invoices.

    ·    Added ‘Auto-generate invoice number?’ and ‘Invoice number format’ fields to import and export vendor templates.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, importing fields such as ‘Advice email method’ with T/F instead of 1/0 caused the import to fail.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the EFT files for various formats / banks were rejected if the length of data in certain text fields in your vendors exceed the maximum length of the associated field for the format used. The EFT file for \\\"CIBC 1464 format CAD\\\" was rejected by the bank in all cases. There was no problem if your EFT Provider was Telpay.

    ·    In Payables 9.2A, the EFT file created for the ‘Montreal 80 format’ was rejected by the bank.

    ·    Ships ODBC Connection String utility that can be used to help troubleshoot report problems. Installs OCSTest.exe and ConnectionTesterInfo.pdf in \Softrak\System.

    ·    When starting Adagio 9.2A versions, the Crystal Reports Runtime (used to print reports) intermittently displayed an error such as “The program can't start because TraceLog-4-0.dll is missing from your computer.” when in fact the DLL file was present and reports did print without problem. Installing Payables 9.2A (2015.06.09) should correct this for all 9.2A modules.



© Copyright Softrak Systems Inc. All rights reserved.